#	Team	MP	W	D	L	G	GD	Pts	Form
1.	Trelleborg	5	4	1	0	12:4	8	13
2.	AFC Malmo	5	4	0	1	12:6	6	12
3.	Hassleholms IF	5	3	1	1	11:7	4	10
4.	Olympic	5	3	1	1	9:8	1	10
5.	Atvidaberg	5	2	3	0	15:8	7	9
6.	Angelholm	5	2	2	1	10:8	2	8
7.	Lunds	5	2	2	1	7:7	0	8
8.	Rosengard	5	2	1	2	10:8	2	7
9.	Tvaaker	5	2	1	2	10:11	-1	7
10.	Laholms	5	2	0	3	11:10	1	6
11.	Eskilsminne	5	2	0	3	7:10	-3	6
12.	Jonkoping	5	1	1	3	5:5	0	4
13.	Skovde AIK	5	1	1	3	4:11	-7	4
14.	Kristianstad	5	0	3	2	4:8	-4	3
15.	Trollhattan	5	0	3	2	6:11	-5	3
16.	Utsikten	5	0	0	5	3:14	-11	0

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_SCORE_DIFF

#	Team	MP	W	D	L	G	GD	Pts	Form
1.	AFC Malmo	10	8	0	2	24:9	15	24
2.	Trelleborg	10	6	4	0	19:9	10	22
3.	Rosengard	10	6	1	3	19:12	7	19
4.	Lunds	10	5	3	2	21:14	7	18
5.	Atvidaberg	10	4	5	1	24:15	9	17
6.	Jonkoping	10	5	2	3	16:7	9	17
7.	Tvaaker	10	5	2	3	15:14	1	17
8.	Angelholm	10	3	4	3	19:15	4	13
9.	Eskilsminne	10	4	1	5	19:19	0	13
10.	Hassleholms IF	10	4	1	5	17:17	0	13
11.	Olympic	10	4	1	5	15:16	-1	13
12.	Laholms	10	4	0	6	20:22	-2	12
13.	Skovde AIK	10	2	4	4	9:19	-10	10
14.	Kristianstad	10	2	3	5	9:16	-7	9
15.	Trollhattan	10	0	6	4	10:19	-9	6
16.	Utsikten	10	0	1	9	5:29	-24	1

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_SCORE_DIFF

#	Team	MP	W	D	L	G	GD	Pts	Form
1.	Trelleborg	14	9	5	0	33:12	21	32
2.	AFC Malmo	14	8	3	3	28:16	12	27
3.	Atvidaberg	14	7	5	2	30:18	12	26
4.	Lunds	14	7	5	2	26:16	10	26
5.	Rosengard	14	6	4	4	23:19	4	22
6.	Hassleholms IF	14	6	3	5	27:22	5	21
7.	Tvaaker	14	6	3	5	17:19	-2	21
8.	Eskilsminne	15	6	2	7	25:28	-3	20
9.	Olympic	14	6	1	7	22:24	-2	19
10.	Jonkoping	14	5	3	6	20:15	5	18
11.	Angelholm	14	3	7	4	22:22	0	16
12.	Skovde AIK	14	3	7	4	11:20	-9	16
13.	Kristianstad	15	3	5	7	16:24	-8	14
14.	Laholms	14	4	1	9	21:29	-8	13
15.	Trollhattan	14	2	7	5	18:26	-8	13
16.	Utsikten	14	1	1	12	10:39	-29	4

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_SCORE_DIFF