#TeamMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1.Viettel523014:3119
2.Dak Lak523010:559
3.Nam Dinh523010:649
4.Dong Nai52216:608
5.Ho Chi Minh52129:547
6.Fico Tay Ninh52126:8-27
7.Binh Phuoc512210:915
8.Hue51228:9-15
9.Phu Yen51136:12-64
10.Ca Mau FC51043:19-163
TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_SCORE_DIFF
#TeamMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1.Ho Chi Minh1071220:81222
2.Dong Nai1063115:9621
3.Viettel1054122:61619
4.Dak Lak1043319:14515
5.Nam Dinh1035216:13314
6.Fico Tay Ninh1033411:15-412
7.Hue1032514:14011
8.Binh Phuoc1023519:1909
9.Phu Yen1022612:26-148
10.Ca Mau FC101279:33-245
TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_SCORE_DIFF
#TeamMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1.Ho Chi Minh15112234:122235
2.Dong Nai1584321:13828
3.Viettel1576228:111727
4.Nam Dinh1558222:14823
5.Fico Tay Ninh1564520:22-222
6.Dak Lak1563628:26221
7.Hue1554625:20519
8.Binh Phuoc1533922:28-612
9.Phu Yen1533915:38-2312
10.Ca Mau FC15131112:43-316
TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_SCORE_DIFF
#TeamMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1.Ho Chi Minh18123338:152339
2.Viettel1888231:121932
3.Nam Dinh1888225:141132
4.Dong Nai1886424:17730
5.Fico Tay Ninh1867523:25-225
6.Dak Lak1865731:30123
7.Hue1864829:26322
8.Binh Phuoc18441029:36-716
9.Phu Yen18441020:41-2116
10.Ca Mau FC18151213:47-348
TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_SCORE_DIFF